netdev - [PATCH bpf-next v8 08/10] selftests/bpf: Add test_verifier support to fixup kfunc call insns

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 14 Jan 2022 22:09:51 +0530
From:   Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>
To:     bpf@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...dia.com>,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v8 08/10] selftests/bpf: Add test_verifier support to fixup kfunc call insns

This allows us to add tests (esp. negative tests) where we only want to
ensure the program doesn't pass through the verifier, and also verify
the error. The next commit will add the tests making use of this.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 76cd903117af..29bbaa58233c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
 #include <linux/if_ether.h>
 #include <linux/btf.h>
 
+#include <bpf/btf.h>
 #include <bpf/bpf.h>
 #include <bpf/libbpf.h>
 
@@ -66,6 +67,11 @@ static bool unpriv_disabled = false;
 static int skips;
 static bool verbose = false;
 
+struct kfunc_btf_id_pair {
+	const char *kfunc;
+	int insn_idx;
+};
+
 struct bpf_test {
 	const char *descr;
 	struct bpf_insn	insns[MAX_INSNS];
@@ -92,6 +98,7 @@ struct bpf_test {
 	int fixup_map_reuseport_array[MAX_FIXUPS];
 	int fixup_map_ringbuf[MAX_FIXUPS];
 	int fixup_map_timer[MAX_FIXUPS];
+	struct kfunc_btf_id_pair fixup_kfunc_btf_id[MAX_FIXUPS];
 	/* Expected verifier log output for result REJECT or VERBOSE_ACCEPT.
 	 * Can be a tab-separated sequence of expected strings. An empty string
 	 * means no log verification.
@@ -744,6 +751,7 @@ static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, enum bpf_prog_type prog_type,
 	int *fixup_map_reuseport_array = test->fixup_map_reuseport_array;
 	int *fixup_map_ringbuf = test->fixup_map_ringbuf;
 	int *fixup_map_timer = test->fixup_map_timer;
+	struct kfunc_btf_id_pair *fixup_kfunc_btf_id = test->fixup_kfunc_btf_id;
 
 	if (test->fill_helper) {
 		test->fill_insns = calloc(MAX_TEST_INSNS, sizeof(struct bpf_insn));
@@ -936,6 +944,26 @@ static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, enum bpf_prog_type prog_type,
 			fixup_map_timer++;
 		} while (*fixup_map_timer);
 	}
+
+	/* Patch in kfunc BTF IDs */
+	if (fixup_kfunc_btf_id->kfunc) {
+		struct btf *btf;
+		int btf_id;
+
+		do {
+			btf_id = 0;
+			btf = btf__load_vmlinux_btf();
+			if (btf) {
+				btf_id = btf__find_by_name_kind(btf,
+								fixup_kfunc_btf_id->kfunc,
+								BTF_KIND_FUNC);
+				btf_id = btf_id < 0 ? 0 : btf_id;
+			}
+			btf__free(btf);
+			prog[fixup_kfunc_btf_id->insn_idx].imm = btf_id;
+			fixup_kfunc_btf_id++;
+		} while (fixup_kfunc_btf_id->kfunc);
+	}
 }
 
 struct libcap {
-- 
2.34.1