netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH] vhost: cache avail index in vhost_enable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 14 Jan 2022 09:02:05 +0100
From:   Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To:     Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc:     virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] vhost: cache avail index in vhost_enable_notify()

On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 02:18:01PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 10:57 PM Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> In vhost_enable_notify() we enable the notifications and we read
>> the avail index to check if new buffers have become available in
>> the meantime. In this case, the device would go to re-read avail
>> index to access the descriptor.
>>
>> As we already do in other place, we can cache the value in `avail_idx`
>> and compare it with `last_avail_idx` to check if there are new
>> buffers available.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
>
>Patch looks fine but I guess we won't get performance improvement
>since it doesn't save any userspace/VM memory access?

It should save the memory access when vhost_enable_notify() find 
something new in the VQ, so in this path:

     vhost_enable_notify() <- VM memory access for avail index
       == true

     vhost_disable_notify()
     ...

     vhost_get_vq_desc()   <- VM memory access for avail index
                              with the patch applied, this access is 
                              avoided since avail index is cached

In any case, I don't expect this to be a very common path, indeed we
usually use unlikely() for this path:

     if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(dev, vq))) {
         vhost_disable_notify(dev, vq);
         continue;
     }

So I don't expect a significant performance increase.

v1 coming with a better commit description.

Thanks,
Stefano