[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YeRaSdg8TcNJsGBB@TonyMac-Alibaba>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 01:47:53 +0800
From: Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: kgraul@...ux.ibm.com, kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/6] net/smc: Spread workload over multiple
cores
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 11:00:33AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 01:48:46PM +0800, Tony Lu wrote:
> > <snip>
> >
> > These patches are still improving, I am very glad to hear your advice.
>
> Please CC RDMA mailing list next time.
I will do it in the next patch.
> Why didn't you use already existed APIs in drivers/infiniband/core/cq.c?
> ib_cq_pool_get() will do most if not all of your open-coded CQ spreading
> logic.
Thanks for your advice. I have looked into this API about shared CQ
pool. It should suit for this scene after my brief test. I will replace
the logic of least-used CQ to this CQ pool API in the next patch.
Thank you.
Tony Lu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists