[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <776c385c-84f8-4716-8561-52f60463e202@marcan.st>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 15:58:20 +0900
From: Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>
To: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Arend van Spriel <aspriel@...il.com>,
Franky Lin <franky.lin@...adcom.com>,
Hante Meuleman <hante.meuleman@...adcom.com>,
Chi-hsien Lin <chi-hsien.lin@...ineon.com>,
Wright Feng <wright.feng@...ineon.com>,
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc: Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>,
Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
Mark Kettenis <kettenis@...nbsd.org>,
Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieter-paul.giesberts@...adcom.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
"brian m. carlson" <sandals@...stytoothpaste.net>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com,
SHA-cyfmac-dev-list@...ineon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 23/35] brcmfmac: cfg80211: Add support for scan params
v2
On 11/01/2022 17.50, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 1/4/2022 8:26 AM, Hector Martin wrote:
>> This new API version is required for at least the BCM4387 firmware. Add
>> support for it, with a fallback to the v1 API.
>
> Reviewed-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>
>> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>
>> ---
>> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c | 113 ++++++++++++++----
>> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/feature.c | 1 +
>> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/feature.h | 4 +-
>> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fwil_types.h | 49 +++++++-
>> 4 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c
>> index fb727778312c..71e932a8302c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c
>> @@ -769,12 +769,50 @@ void brcmf_set_mpc(struct brcmf_if *ifp, int mpc)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +static void brcmf_escan_prep(struct brcmf_cfg80211_info *cfg,
>> + struct brcmf_scan_params_v2_le *params_le,
>> + struct cfg80211_scan_request *request);
>
> I am not a fan of function prototypes so if it can be avoided by simply
> moving the function that would be preferred over this.
Moved the function for v3 :)
>> + if (!brcmf_feat_is_enabled(ifp, BRCMF_FEAT_SCAN_V2)) {
>
> Okay. So it is not really a fallback. Phew!
I meant fallback in case the feature is not present, not fallback from
trying to use it without checking. Thankfully we can use a feature test
for this :-)
--
Hector Martin (marcan@...can.st)
Public Key: https://mrcn.st/pub
Powered by blists - more mailing lists