lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 20:07:40 +0300 From: Akhmat Karakotov <hmukos@...dex-team.ru> To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>, Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@...com>, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, Alexander Azimov <mitradir@...dex-team.ru>, Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>, zeil@...dex-team.ru, davem@...emloft.net Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tcp: Use BPF timeout setting for SYN ACK RTO On Jan 18, 2022, at 20:04, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 19:49:49 +0300 Akhmat Karakotov wrote: >> On Jan 18, 2022, at 18:57, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 18:26:45 +0300 Akhmat Karakotov wrote: >>>> We got the patch acked couple of weeks ago, please let us know what >>>> further steps are required before merge. >>> >>> Did you post a v4 addressing Yuchung's request? >> >> I thought that Yuchung suggested to make a separate refactor patch? > > Unclear whether separate patch implies separate "series" there. > >>> but that can be done by a later refactor patch >> >> But if necessary I will integrate those changes in this patch with v4. > > Right, net-next is closed, anyway, v4 as a 2-patch mini-series may be > the best way. Why separate then if the second patch is just a refactor? Wouldn't single patch be simpler and better?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists