[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220118123413.70f469bd@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 12:34:13 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
madalin.bucur@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/4] net/fsl: xgmac_mdio: Add workaround for erratum
A-009885
On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 15:00:41 +0100 Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > Should I send a v2 even if nothing else
> > pops up, or is this more of a if-you're-sending-a-v2-anyway type of
> > comment?
>
> If you reply with a Fixes: patchwork will automagically append it like
> it does Reviewed-by, Tested-by etc.
That part is pretty finicky, it's supposed to work but when I apply
these I only get review tags from Andrew and a Fixes tag already
present on the last patch :(
A v2 with Fixes tags included in the posting would be best after all.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists