[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQLf+HCOTyK3=ur34Lb1GWKAvbgDvvC4AGAYBGvF=BL+BQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 15:53:46 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.co.jp>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...zon.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/5] bpf: Batching iter for AF_UNIX sockets.
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 4:29 PM Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.co.jp> wrote:
>
> Last year the commit afd20b9290e1 ("af_unix: Replace the big lock with
> small locks.") landed on bpf-next. Now we can use a batching algorithm
> for AF_UNIX bpf iter as TCP bpf iter.
>
>
> Changelog:
> - Add the 1st patch.
> - Call unix_get_first() in .start()/.next() to always acquire a lock in
> each iteration in the 2nd patch.
Applied. Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists