[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ed387a90-586d-5071-baa6-bc66d4e7f22f@broadcom.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 13:36:43 +0100
From: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>
To: Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Arend van Spriel <aspriel@...il.com>,
Franky Lin <franky.lin@...adcom.com>,
Hante Meuleman <hante.meuleman@...adcom.com>,
Chi-hsien Lin <chi-hsien.lin@...ineon.com>,
Wright Feng <wright.feng@...ineon.com>,
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc: Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>,
Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
Mark Kettenis <kettenis@...nbsd.org>,
Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieter-paul.giesberts@...adcom.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
"brian m. carlson" <sandals@...stytoothpaste.net>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com,
SHA-cyfmac-dev-list@...ineon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 22/35] brcmfmac: chip: Handle 1024-unit sizes for TCM
blocks
On 1/4/2022 8:26 AM, Hector Martin wrote:
> BCM4387 has trailing odd-sized blocks as part of TCM which have
> their size described as a multiple of 1024 instead of 8192. Handle this
> so we can compute the TCM size properly.
Reviewed-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>
> ---
> .../wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/chip.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/chip.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/chip.c
> index 713546cebd5a..cfa93e3ef1a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/chip.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/chip.c
> @@ -212,8 +212,8 @@ struct sbsocramregs {
> #define ARMCR4_TCBANB_MASK 0xf
> #define ARMCR4_TCBANB_SHIFT 0
>
> -#define ARMCR4_BSZ_MASK 0x3f
> -#define ARMCR4_BSZ_MULT 8192
> +#define ARMCR4_BSZ_MASK 0x7f
> +#define ARMCR4_BLK_1K_MASK 0x200
>
> struct brcmf_core_priv {
> struct brcmf_core pub;
> @@ -675,7 +675,8 @@ static u32 brcmf_chip_sysmem_ramsize(struct brcmf_core_priv *sysmem)
> }
>
> /** Return the TCM-RAM size of the ARMCR4 core. */
> -static u32 brcmf_chip_tcm_ramsize(struct brcmf_core_priv *cr4)
> +static u32 brcmf_chip_tcm_ramsize(struct brcmf_chip_priv *ci,
> + struct brcmf_core_priv *cr4)
Not sure why you add ci parameter here. It is not used below or am I
overlooking something.
> {
> u32 corecap;
> u32 memsize = 0;
> @@ -683,6 +684,7 @@ static u32 brcmf_chip_tcm_ramsize(struct brcmf_core_priv *cr4)
> u32 nbb;
> u32 totb;
> u32 bxinfo;
> + u32 blksize;
> u32 idx;
>
> corecap = brcmf_chip_core_read32(cr4, ARMCR4_CAP);
> @@ -694,7 +696,12 @@ static u32 brcmf_chip_tcm_ramsize(struct brcmf_core_priv *cr4)
> for (idx = 0; idx < totb; idx++) {
> brcmf_chip_core_write32(cr4, ARMCR4_BANKIDX, idx);
> bxinfo = brcmf_chip_core_read32(cr4, ARMCR4_BANKINFO);
> - memsize += ((bxinfo & ARMCR4_BSZ_MASK) + 1) * ARMCR4_BSZ_MULT;
> + if (bxinfo & ARMCR4_BLK_1K_MASK)
> + blksize = 1024;
> + else
> + blksize = 8192;
> +
> + memsize += ((bxinfo & ARMCR4_BSZ_MASK) + 1) * blksize;
> }
>
> return memsize;
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4219 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists