[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220119100102.61f9bfde@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 10:01:02 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
"nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org" <nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Emma Anholt <emma@...olt.net>, Eryk Brol <eryk.brol@....com>,
Francis Laniel <laniel_francis@...vacyrequired.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Kentaro Takeda <takedakn@...data.co.jp>,
Leo Li <sunpeng.li@....com>,
Mikita Lipski <mikita.lipski@....com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Rahul Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkireddy@...lsio.com>,
Raju Rangoju <rajur@...lsio.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Vishal Kulkarni <vishal@...lsio.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] lib/string_helpers: Consolidate yesno()
implementation
On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 11:15:08 +0200
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> > +static inline const char *yesno(bool v) { return v ? "yes" : "no"; }
>
>
>
> Perhaps keep it on 4 lines? Yes, yes/no is short, but if we add others
> (enable/disable) it will not be possible to keep on one line. And hence
> style will be broken among similar functions.
Agreed. Functions should always be of the normal format:
type func(params)
{
body;
}
Unless it is a stub function.
type func(params) { return 0; }
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists