[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f0470e8b-67af-6788-0bca-0be03bb5d0b3@omp.ru>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 18:50:12 +0300
From: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
<linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
<linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
<openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Saravanan Sekar <sravanhome@...il.com>,
Khuong Dinh <khuong@...amperecomputing.com>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>,
<kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@...il.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
"Bartosz Golaszewski" <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
<linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
"Jaroslav Kysela" <perex@...ex.cz>,
<platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
"Robert Richter" <rric@...nel.org>,
Zha Qipeng <qipeng.zha@...el.com>,
Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Korsgaard <peter@...sgaard.com>,
William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>,
"Mark Gross" <markgross@...nel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
"Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Mun Yew Tham <mun.yew.tham@...el.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>, <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>,
<linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@...natech.se>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Brian Norris" <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] platform: make platform_get_irq_optional() optional
On 1/19/22 6:02 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
[...]
>>> This patch is based on the former Andy Shevchenko's patch:
>>>
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210331144526.19439-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com/
>>>
>>> Currently platform_get_irq_optional() returns an error code even if IRQ
>>> resource simply has not been found. It prevents the callers from being
>>> error code agnostic in their error handling:
>>>
>>> ret = platform_get_irq_optional(...);
>>> if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENXIO)
>>> return ret; // respect deferred probe
>>> if (ret > 0)
>>> ...we get an IRQ...
>>>
>>> All other *_optional() APIs seem to return 0 or NULL in case an optional
>>> resource is not available. Let's follow this good example, so that the
>>> callers would look like:
>>>
>>> ret = platform_get_irq_optional(...);
>>> if (ret < 0)
>>> return ret;
>>> if (ret > 0)
>>> ...we get an IRQ...
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>
>> [...]
>>
>> Please don't merge this as yet, I'm going thru this patch once again
>> and have already found some sloppy code. :-/
>
> Who would you expect to merge this? I would have expected Greg, but he
Me too, it's his area, the message was addressed to Greg KH...
> seems to have given up this thread.
You instill too much uncertainty in him. :-)
>>> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/bt-bmc.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/bt-bmc.c
>>> index 7450904e330a..fdc63bfa5be4 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/bt-bmc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/bt-bmc.c
>>> @@ -382,12 +382,14 @@ static int bt_bmc_config_irq(struct bt_bmc *bt_bmc,
>>> bt_bmc->irq = platform_get_irq_optional(pdev, 0);
>>> if (bt_bmc->irq < 0)
>>> return bt_bmc->irq;
>>> + if (!bt_bmc->irq)
>>> + return 0;
>>
>> Hm, this is sloppy. Will recast and rebase to the -next branch.
>
> I didn't think about what you mean with sloppy, but the code is
> equivalent to
>
> if (bt_bmc->irq <= 0)
> return bt_bmc->irq;
Exactly.
[...]
>>> diff --git a/drivers/edac/xgene_edac.c b/drivers/edac/xgene_edac.c
>>> index 2ccd1db5e98f..0d1bdd27cd78 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/edac/xgene_edac.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/edac/xgene_edac.c
>>> @@ -1917,7 +1917,7 @@ static int xgene_edac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>
>>> for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
>>> irq = platform_get_irq_optional(pdev, i);
>>
>> Is *_optinal() even correct here?
>
> _optinal isn't correct, _optional maybe is. :-)
No. :-)
> Anyhow, look at e26124cd5f7099949109608845bba9e9bf96599c, the driver was
> fixed not to print two error messages and the wrong option was picked.
I think this patch is wrong...
>>> - if (irq < 0) {
>>> + if (irq <= 0) {
>>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No IRQ resource\n");
This is what needed to be thrown overboard... :-)
>>> rc = -EINVAL;
>>> goto out_err;
>
> What's wrong here is that the return code is hardcoded ...
This is wrong as well -- kills the deferred probing. I have 2 separate patches
for this driver now... just need some time to get 'em ready...
[...]
>>> index bdf924b73e47..51289700a7ac 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/power/supply/mp2629_charger.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/mp2629_charger.c
>>> @@ -581,9 +581,9 @@ static int mp2629_charger_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, charger);
>>>
>>> irq = platform_get_irq_optional(to_platform_device(dev->parent), 0);
>>
>> Again, is *_optional() even correct here?
>>
>>> - if (irq < 0) {
>>> + if (irq <= 0) {
>>> dev_err(dev, "get irq fail: %d\n", irq);
>>> - return irq;
>>> + return irq < 0 ? irq : -ENXIO;
>
> Ack, could be simplified by switching to platform_get_irq().
Have a draft patch...
> Best regards
> Uwe
MBR, Sergey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists