[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220120141219.GB11707@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 15:12:19 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: Phyr Starter
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 12:17:18AM -0800, John Hubbard wrote:
> Zooming in on the pinning aspect for a moment: last time I attempted to
> convert O_DIRECT callers from gup to pup, I recall wanting very much to
> record, in each bio_vec, whether these pages were acquired via FOLL_PIN,
> or some non-FOLL_PIN method. Because at the end of the IO, it is not
> easy to disentangle which pages require put_page() and which require
> unpin_user_page*().
I don't think that is a problem. Pinning only need to happen for
ITER_IOVEC, and the only non-user pages there is the ZERO_PAGE added
for padding that can be special cased.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists