netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] net/smc: Introduce receive queue flow control support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 22 Jan 2022 00:36:21 +0800
From:   Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        kuba@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] net/smc: Introduce receive queue flow
 control support

On 2022/1/20 19:03, Karsten Graul wrote:> 
> I really appreciate your effort to improve the performance and solve existing bottle necks,
> but please keep in mind that the SMC module implements the IBM SMC protocol that is
> described here: https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6326337
> (you can find these links in the source code, too).
> 
> Your patch makes changes that are not described in this design paper and may lead to
> future incompatibilities with other platforms that support the IBM SMC protocol.
> 
> For example:
> - you start using one of the reserved bytes in struct smc_cdc_msg
> - you define a new smc_llc message type 0x0A
> - you change the maximum number of connections per link group from 255 to 32
> 
> We need to start a discussion about your (good!) ideas with the owners of the protocol.

Thanks for your affirmation of my effort and looking forward
to the conclusion of the protocol discussion.