[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f85dcb52-1f66-f75a-d6de-83d238b5b69d@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 19:22:27 -0800
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
Alvin Šipraga <ALSI@...g-olufsen.dk>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"vivien.didelot@...il.com" <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
"arinc.unal@...nc9.com" <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 11/11] net: dsa: realtek: rtl8365mb: multiple
cpu ports, non cpu extint
On 1/20/2022 7:13 PM, Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca wrote:
>> :) device tree properties are not the fix for everything!
>
> I'm still getting used to it ;-)
>
> In this thread, Alvin suggested adding a new property to define which
> port will be used as trap_port instead of using the last CPU port.
> Should I try something different?
>
> switch1 {
> compatible = "realtek,rtl8367s";
> reg = <29>;
>
> realtek,trap-port = <&port7>;
>
> ports {
> ....
> port7: port@7 {
> ...
> };
> };
>
> Should I do something differently?
>
>> I think I know what the problem is. But I'd need to know what the driver
>> for the DSA master is, to confirm. To be precise, what I'd like to check
>> is the value of master->vlan_features.
>
> Here it is 0x1099513266227 (I hope). Oh, this DSA driver still does
> not implement vlan nor bridge offload. Maybe it would matter.
Are we talking about an in tree driver? If so which is it?
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists