[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YetjpvBgQFApTRu0@lunn.ch>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2022 02:53:42 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc: Sergei Trofimovich <slyich@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: atl1c drivers run 'napi/eth%d-385' named threads with
unsubstituted %d
> > So please give this a try. I've not even compile tested it...
> >
> > iff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atl1c/atl1c_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atl1c/atl1c_main.c
> > index da595242bc13..983a52f77bda 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atl1c/atl1c_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atl1c/atl1c_main.c
> > @@ -2706,6 +2706,10 @@ static int atl1c_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
> > goto err_alloc_etherdev;
> > }
> >
> > + err = dev_alloc_name(netdev, netdev->name);
> > + if (err < 0)
> > + goto err_init_netdev;
> > +
> > err = atl1c_init_netdev(netdev, pdev);
> > if (err) {
> > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "init netdevice failed\n");
> >
> > If this works, i can turn it into a real patch submission.
> >
> > Andrew
>
>
> This may not work right because probe is not called with RTNL.
> And the alloc_name is using RTNL to prevent two devices from
> getting the same name.
Oh, yes. I looked at some of the users. And some do take rtnl before
calling it. And some don't!
Looking at register_netdev(), it seems we need something like:
if (rtnl_lock_killable()) {
err = -EINTR;
goto err_init_netdev;
}
err = dev_alloc_name(netdev, netdev->name);
rtnl_unlock();
if (err < 0)
goto err_init_netdev;
It might also be a good idea to put a ASSERT_RTNL() in
__dev_alloc_name() to catch any driver doing this wrong.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists