[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220122200310.6fzcjlg2ziuauybq@kafai-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2022 12:03:10 -0800
From: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
CC: <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 1/4] net: Add skb->mono_delivery_time to
distinguish mono delivery_time from (rcv) timestamp
On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 10:32:16AM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > + * delivery_time in mono clock base (i.e. EDT). Otherwise, the
> > + * skb->tstamp has the (rcv) timestamp at ingress and
> > + * delivery_time at egress.
> > * @napi_id: id of the NAPI struct this skb came from
> > * @sender_cpu: (aka @napi_id) source CPU in XPS
> > * @secmark: security marking
> > @@ -890,6 +894,7 @@ struct sk_buff {
> > __u8 decrypted:1;
> > #endif
> > __u8 slow_gro:1;
> > + __u8 mono_delivery_time:1;
>
> This bit fills a hole, does not change sk_buff size, right?
[ Sorry, cut too much when sending the last reply ]
Correct. With this +1 bit, it still has a 3 bits and a 1 byte hole
before tc_index when every CONFIG_* among these bits are turned on.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists