lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 02:33:23 +0100 From: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com> To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Cc: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>, Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com> Subject: [RFC PATCH v7 02/16] net: dsa: replay master state events in dsa_tree_{setup,teardown}_master From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com> In order for switch driver to be able to make simple and reliable use of the master tracking operations, they must also be notified of the initial state of the DSA master, not just of the changes. This is because they might enable certain features only during the time when they know that the DSA master is up and running. Therefore, this change explicitly checks the state of the DSA master under the same rtnl_mutex as we were holding during the dsa_master_setup() and dsa_master_teardown() call. The idea being that if the DSA master became operational in between the moment in which it became a DSA master (dsa_master_setup set dev->dsa_ptr) and the moment when we checked for the master being up, there is a chance that we would emit a ->master_state_change() call with no actual state change. We need to avoid that by serializing the concurrent netdevice event with us. If the netdevice event started before, we force it to finish before we begin, because we take rtnl_lock before making netdev_uses_dsa() return true. So we also handle that early event and do nothing on it. Similarly, if the dev_open() attempt is concurrent with us, it will attempt to take the rtnl_mutex, but we're holding it. We'll see that the master flag IFF_UP isn't set, then when we release the rtnl_mutex we'll process the NETDEV_UP notifier. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com> Signed-off-by: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com> --- net/dsa/dsa2.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa2.c b/net/dsa/dsa2.c index ff998c0ede02..909b045c9b11 100644 --- a/net/dsa/dsa2.c +++ b/net/dsa/dsa2.c @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ #include <linux/of.h> #include <linux/of_net.h> #include <net/devlink.h> +#include <net/sch_generic.h> #include "dsa_priv.h" @@ -1064,9 +1065,18 @@ static int dsa_tree_setup_master(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst) list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list) { if (dsa_port_is_cpu(dp)) { - err = dsa_master_setup(dp->master, dp); + struct net_device *master = dp->master; + bool admin_up = (master->flags & IFF_UP) && + !qdisc_tx_is_noop(master); + + err = dsa_master_setup(master, dp); if (err) return err; + + /* Replay master state event */ + dsa_tree_master_admin_state_change(dst, master, admin_up); + dsa_tree_master_oper_state_change(dst, master, + netif_oper_up(master)); } } @@ -1081,9 +1091,19 @@ static void dsa_tree_teardown_master(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst) rtnl_lock(); - list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list) - if (dsa_port_is_cpu(dp)) - dsa_master_teardown(dp->master); + list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list) { + if (dsa_port_is_cpu(dp)) { + struct net_device *master = dp->master; + + /* Synthesizing an "admin down" state is sufficient for + * the switches to get a notification if the master is + * currently up and running. + */ + dsa_tree_master_admin_state_change(dst, master, false); + + dsa_master_teardown(master); + } + } rtnl_unlock(); } -- 2.33.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists