[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220124165535.tksp4aayeaww7mbf@skbuf>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 18:55:35 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
Alvin Šipraga <ALSI@...g-olufsen.dk>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"vivien.didelot@...il.com" <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"arinc.unal@...nc9.com" <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 11/11] net: dsa: realtek: rtl8365mb: multiple
cpu ports, non cpu extint
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 08:46:49AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> I thought for drivers setting the legacy NETIF_F_IP*_CSUM feature
> it's driver's responsibility to validate the geometry of the packet
> will work with the parser the device has. Or at least I think that's
> what Tom was pushing for when he was cleaning up the checksumming last
> (and wrote the long comment on the subject in skbuff.h).
Sorry Jakub, I don't understand what you mean to say when applied to the
context discussed here?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists