[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202201242135.NjNu33RA-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 22:09:55 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Hao Xu <haoxu@...ux.alibaba.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
io-uring@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] net-zerocopy: split zerocopy receive to several parts
Hi Hao,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v5.17-rc1 next-20220124]
[cannot apply to horms-ipvs/master]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Hao-Xu/io_uring-zerocopy-receive/20220124-174546
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git dd81e1c7d5fb126e5fbc5c9e334d7b3ec29a16a0
config: sh-randconfig-r012-20220124 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220124/202201242135.NjNu33RA-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: sh4-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/8ed32d9a0fe79a5a05e30772afda62dc96232764
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Hao-Xu/io_uring-zerocopy-receive/20220124-174546
git checkout 8ed32d9a0fe79a5a05e30772afda62dc96232764
# save the config file to linux build tree
mkdir build_dir
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross O=build_dir ARCH=sh SHELL=/bin/bash fs/ net/ipv4/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> net/ipv4/tcp.c:3939:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'zc_receive_check' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
3939 | int zc_receive_check(struct tcp_zerocopy_receive *zc, int *lenp,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/ipv4/tcp.c: In function 'zc_receive_check':
>> net/ipv4/tcp.c:3963:31: error: 'TCP_VALID_ZC_MSG_FLAGS' undeclared (first use in this function)
3963 | if (zc->msg_flags & ~(TCP_VALID_ZC_MSG_FLAGS))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/ipv4/tcp.c:3963:31: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
net/ipv4/tcp.c: At top level:
>> net/ipv4/tcp.c:3970:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'zc_receive_update' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
3970 | int zc_receive_update(struct sock *sk, struct tcp_zerocopy_receive *zc, int len,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/ipv4/tcp.c: In function 'zc_receive_update':
>> net/ipv4/tcp.c:3995:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'tcp_zc_finalize_rx_tstamp' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
3995 | tcp_zc_finalize_rx_tstamp(sk, zc, tss);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +/TCP_VALID_ZC_MSG_FLAGS +3963 net/ipv4/tcp.c
3938
> 3939 int zc_receive_check(struct tcp_zerocopy_receive *zc, int *lenp,
3940 char __user *optval, int __user *optlen)
3941 {
3942 int len = *lenp, err;
3943
3944 if (get_user(len, optlen))
3945 return -EFAULT;
3946 if (len < 0 ||
3947 len < offsetofend(struct tcp_zerocopy_receive, length))
3948 return -EINVAL;
3949 if (unlikely(len > sizeof(*zc))) {
3950 err = check_zeroed_user(optval + sizeof(*zc),
3951 len - sizeof(*zc));
3952 if (err < 1)
3953 return err == 0 ? -EINVAL : err;
3954 len = sizeof(*zc);
3955 if (put_user(len, optlen))
3956 return -EFAULT;
3957 }
3958 if (copy_from_user(zc, optval, len))
3959 return -EFAULT;
3960
3961 if (zc->reserved)
3962 return -EINVAL;
> 3963 if (zc->msg_flags & ~(TCP_VALID_ZC_MSG_FLAGS))
3964 return -EINVAL;
3965
3966 *lenp = len;
3967 return 0;
3968 }
3969
> 3970 int zc_receive_update(struct sock *sk, struct tcp_zerocopy_receive *zc, int len,
3971 char __user *optval, struct scm_timestamping_internal *tss,
3972 int err)
3973 {
3974 sk_defer_free_flush(sk);
3975 if (len >= offsetofend(struct tcp_zerocopy_receive, msg_flags))
3976 goto zerocopy_rcv_cmsg;
3977 switch (len) {
3978 case offsetofend(struct tcp_zerocopy_receive, msg_flags):
3979 goto zerocopy_rcv_cmsg;
3980 case offsetofend(struct tcp_zerocopy_receive, msg_controllen):
3981 case offsetofend(struct tcp_zerocopy_receive, msg_control):
3982 case offsetofend(struct tcp_zerocopy_receive, flags):
3983 case offsetofend(struct tcp_zerocopy_receive, copybuf_len):
3984 case offsetofend(struct tcp_zerocopy_receive, copybuf_address):
3985 case offsetofend(struct tcp_zerocopy_receive, err):
3986 goto zerocopy_rcv_sk_err;
3987 case offsetofend(struct tcp_zerocopy_receive, inq):
3988 goto zerocopy_rcv_inq;
3989 case offsetofend(struct tcp_zerocopy_receive, length):
3990 default:
3991 goto zerocopy_rcv_out;
3992 }
3993 zerocopy_rcv_cmsg:
3994 if (zc->msg_flags & TCP_CMSG_TS)
> 3995 tcp_zc_finalize_rx_tstamp(sk, zc, tss);
3996 else
3997 zc->msg_flags = 0;
3998 zerocopy_rcv_sk_err:
3999 if (!err)
4000 zc->err = sock_error(sk);
4001 zerocopy_rcv_inq:
4002 zc->inq = tcp_inq_hint(sk);
4003 zerocopy_rcv_out:
4004 if (!err && copy_to_user(optval, zc, len))
4005 err = -EFAULT;
4006 return err;
4007 }
4008
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists