[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YfA0Ov8Skh0e50uA@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 18:32:42 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Robert Hancock <robert.hancock@...ian.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, woojung.huh@...rochip.com,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, vivien.didelot@...il.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, olteanv@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, marex@...x.de,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] net: dsa: microchip: Add property to
disable reference clock
> dev->synclko_125 = of_property_read_bool(dev->dev->of_node,
> "microchip,synclko-125");
> + dev->synclko_disable = of_property_read_bool(dev->dev->of_node,
> + "microchip,synclko-disable");
It seems like microchip,synclko-125 and microchip,synclko-disable are
mutually exclusive? Please add an -EINVAL if both a present.
This should also be mentioned in the binding document.
Thanks
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists