[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220125143008-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 14:30:44 -0500
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>
Cc: jasowang@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/4] vhost_vdpa: don't setup irq offloading when
irq_num < 0
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 05:17:43PM +0800, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
> When irq number is negative(e.g., -EINVAL), the virtqueue
> may be disabled or the virtqueues are sharing a device irq.
> In such case, we should not setup irq offloading for a virtqueue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> index 851539807bc9..909891d518e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> @@ -96,6 +96,9 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_setup_vq_irq(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u16 qid)
> if (!ops->get_vq_irq)
> return;
>
> + if (irq < 0)
> + return;
> +
> irq = ops->get_vq_irq(vdpa, qid);
So it's used before it's initialized. Ugh.
How was this patchset tested?
> irq_bypass_unregister_producer(&vq->call_ctx.producer);
> if (!vq->call_ctx.ctx || irq < 0)
> --
> 2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists