[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAH8bW_u6oNOkMsA_jRyWFHkzjMi0CB7gXmvLYAdjNMSqrrY7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 13:09:58 -0800
From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>,
Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
Alexey Klimov <aklimov@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ariel Elior <aelior@...vell.com>,
Manish Chopra <manishc@...vell.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/54] net: ethernet: replace bitmap_weight with
bitmap_empty for qlogic
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 4:29 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 10:38:41AM -0800, Yury Norov wrote:
> > qlogic/qed code calls bitmap_weight() to check if any bit of a given
> > bitmap is set. It's better to use bitmap_empty() in that case because
> > bitmap_empty() stops traversing the bitmap as soon as it finds first
> > set bit, while bitmap_weight() counts all bits unconditionally.
>
> > - if (bitmap_weight((unsigned long *)&pmap[item], 64 * 8))
> > + if (!bitmap_empty((unsigned long *)&pmap[item], 64 * 8))
>
> > - (bitmap_weight((unsigned long *)&pmap[item],
> > + (!bitmap_empty((unsigned long *)&pmap[item],
>
> Side note, these castings reminds me previous discussion and I'm wondering
> if you have this kind of potentially problematic places in your TODO as
> subject to fix.
In the discussion you mentioned above, the u32* was cast to u64*,
which is wrong. The code
here is safe because in the worst case, it casts u64* to u32*. This
would be OK wrt
-Werror=array-bounds.
The function itself looks like doing this unsigned long <-> u64
conversions just for printing
purpose. I'm not a qlogic expert, so let's wait what people say?
The printing part may be refactored although to use %pb" format,
similarly to the snippet below
(not tested).
Thanks,
Yury
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_rdma.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_rdma.c
index 23b668de4640..72505517ced1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_rdma.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_rdma.c
@@ -336,17 +336,8 @@ void qed_rdma_bmap_free(struct qed_hwfn *p_hwfn,
/* print aligned non-zero lines, if any */
for (item = 0, line = 0; line < last_line; line++, item += 8)
- if (bitmap_weight((unsigned long *)&pmap[item], 64 * 8))
- DP_NOTICE(p_hwfn,
- "line 0x%04x: 0x%016llx 0x%016llx
0x%016llx 0x%016llx 0x%016llx 0x%016llx 0x%016llx 0x%016llx\n",
- line,
- pmap[item],
- pmap[item + 1],
- pmap[item + 2],
- pmap[item + 3],
- pmap[item + 4],
- pmap[item + 5],
- pmap[item + 6], pmap[item + 7]);
+ if (bitmap_weight(bmap->bitmap, 64 * 8))
+ DP_NOTICE(p_hwfn, "line 0x%04x: %512pb\n",
line, bmap->bitmap);
/* print last unaligned non-zero line, if any */
if ((bmap->max_count % (64 * 8)) &&
Powered by blists - more mailing lists