[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220124184156.987692281@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 19:45:32 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Chase Conklin <chase.conklin@....com>,
German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.16 0943/1039] perf evsel: Override attr->sample_period for non-libpfm4 events
From: German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>
commit 3606c0e1a1050d397ad759a62607e419fd8b0ccb upstream.
A previous patch preventing "attr->sample_period" values from being
overridden in pfm events changed a related behaviour in arm-spe.
Before said patch:
perf record -c 10000 -e arm_spe_0// -- sleep 1
Would yield an SPE event with period=10000. After the patch, the period
in "-c 10000" was being ignored because the arm-spe code initializes
sample_period to a non-zero value.
This patch restores the previous behaviour for non-libpfm4 events.
Fixes: ae5dcc8abe31 (“perf record: Prevent override of attr->sample_period for libpfm4 events”)
Reported-by: Chase Conklin <chase.conklin@....com>
Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Cc: KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220118144054.2541-1-german.gomez@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
@@ -1064,6 +1064,17 @@ void __weak arch_evsel__fixup_new_cycles
{
}
+static void evsel__set_default_freq_period(struct record_opts *opts,
+ struct perf_event_attr *attr)
+{
+ if (opts->freq) {
+ attr->freq = 1;
+ attr->sample_freq = opts->freq;
+ } else {
+ attr->sample_period = opts->default_interval;
+ }
+}
+
/*
* The enable_on_exec/disabled value strategy:
*
@@ -1130,14 +1141,12 @@ void evsel__config(struct evsel *evsel,
* We default some events to have a default interval. But keep
* it a weak assumption overridable by the user.
*/
- if (!attr->sample_period) {
- if (opts->freq) {
- attr->freq = 1;
- attr->sample_freq = opts->freq;
- } else {
- attr->sample_period = opts->default_interval;
- }
- }
+ if ((evsel->is_libpfm_event && !attr->sample_period) ||
+ (!evsel->is_libpfm_event && (!attr->sample_period ||
+ opts->user_freq != UINT_MAX ||
+ opts->user_interval != ULLONG_MAX)))
+ evsel__set_default_freq_period(opts, attr);
+
/*
* If attr->freq was set (here or earlier), ask for period
* to be sampled.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists