[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YfEr3Soy8YuJczHk@lore-desk>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 12:09:17 +0100
From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Yoshiki Komachi <komachi.yoshiki@...il.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>,
"bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC bpf-next 1/2] net: bridge: add unstable
br_fdb_find_port_from_ifindex helper
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 10:32 AM Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > +int br_fdb_find_port_from_ifindex(struct xdp_md *xdp_ctx,
> > > + struct bpf_fdb_lookup *opt,
> > > + u32 opt__sz)
> > > +{
> > > + struct xdp_buff *ctx = (struct xdp_buff *)xdp_ctx;
> > > + struct net_bridge_port *port;
> > > + struct net_device *dev;
> > > + int ret = -ENODEV;
> > > +
> > > + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct bpf_fdb_lookup) != NF_BPF_FDB_OPTS_SZ);
> > > + if (!opt || opt__sz != sizeof(struct bpf_fdb_lookup))
> > > + return -ENODEV;
> > > +
> > > + rcu_read_lock();
> > > +
> > > + dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(dev_net(ctx->rxq->dev), opt->ifindex);
> > > + if (!dev)
> > > + goto out;
>
> imo that is way too much wrapping for an unstable helper.
> The dev lookup is not cheap.
>
> With all the extra checks the XDP acceleration gets reduced.
> I think it would be better to use kprobe/fentry on bridge
> functions that operate on fdb and replicate necessary
> data into bpf map.
> Then xdp prog would do a single cheap lookup from that map
> to figure out 'port'.
ack, right. This is a very interesting approach. I will investigate it. Thanks.
Regards,
Lorenzo
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists