netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 3/5] bonding: add ip6_addr for bond_opt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bc3403db-4380-9d84-b507-babdeb929664@nvidia.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Jan 2022 13:35:46 +0200
From:   Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com>
To:     Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
        Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
        Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 3/5] bonding: add ip6_addr for bond_opt_value

On 26/01/2022 09:35, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> Adding a new field ip6_addr for bond_opt_value so we can get
> IPv6 address in future.
> 
> Also change the checking logic of __bond_opt_init(). Set string
> or addr when there is, otherwise set the value.
> 
> Is there a need to update bond_opt_parse() for IPv6 address? I think the
> checking in patch 05 should be enough.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
> ---
>  include/net/bond_options.h | 12 ++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/bond_options.h b/include/net/bond_options.h
> index dd75c071f67e..a9e68e88ff73 100644
> --- a/include/net/bond_options.h
> +++ b/include/net/bond_options.h
> @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ struct bond_opt_value {
>  	char *string;
>  	u64 value;
>  	u32 flags;
> +	struct in6_addr ip6_addr;
>  };
>  
>  struct bonding;
> @@ -118,17 +119,20 @@ const struct bond_opt_value *bond_opt_get_val(unsigned int option, u64 val);
>   * When value is ULLONG_MAX then string will be used.
>   */
>  static inline void __bond_opt_init(struct bond_opt_value *optval,
> -				   char *string, u64 value)
> +				   char *string, u64 value, struct in6_addr *addr)
>  {
>  	memset(optval, 0, sizeof(*optval));
>  	optval->value = ULLONG_MAX;
> -	if (value == ULLONG_MAX)
> +	if (string)
>  		optval->string = string;
> +	else if (addr)
> +		optval->ip6_addr = *addr;
>  	else
>  		optval->value = value;
>  }
> -#define bond_opt_initval(optval, value) __bond_opt_init(optval, NULL, value)
> -#define bond_opt_initstr(optval, str) __bond_opt_init(optval, str, ULLONG_MAX)
> +#define bond_opt_initval(optval, value) __bond_opt_init(optval, NULL, value, NULL)
> +#define bond_opt_initstr(optval, str) __bond_opt_init(optval, str, ULLONG_MAX, NULL)
> +#define bond_opt_initaddr(optval, addr) __bond_opt_init(optval, NULL, ULLONG_MAX, addr)
>  
>  void bond_option_arp_ip_targets_clear(struct bonding *bond);
>  

Please don't add arbitrary fields to struct bond_opt_value. As the comment above it states:
/* This structure is used for storing option values and for passing option
 * values when changing an option. The logic when used as an arg is as follows:
 * - if string != NULL -> parse it, if the opt is RAW type then return it, else
 *   return the parse result
 * - if string == NULL -> parse value
 */

You can use an anonymous union to extend value's size and use the extra room for storage
only, that should keep most of the current logic intact.

Thanks,
 Nik