[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e6ef0e04-f7ee-a4e4-5975-855c8f6b9da7@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 20:18:13 +0800
From: "Zhu, Lingshan" <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: jasowang@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/4] vhost_vdpa: don't setup irq offloading when
irq_num < 0
On 1/26/2022 3:30 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 05:17:43PM +0800, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
>> When irq number is negative(e.g., -EINVAL), the virtqueue
>> may be disabled or the virtqueues are sharing a device irq.
>> In such case, we should not setup irq offloading for a virtqueue.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
>> index 851539807bc9..909891d518e8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
>> @@ -96,6 +96,9 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_setup_vq_irq(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u16 qid)
>> if (!ops->get_vq_irq)
>> return;
>>
>> + if (irq < 0)
>> + return;
>> +
>> irq = ops->get_vq_irq(vdpa, qid);
> So it's used before it's initialized. Ugh.
> How was this patchset tested?
Sorry, my bad, it is not rebased properly, V3 can fix this for sure.
Thanks
>
>> irq_bypass_unregister_producer(&vq->call_ctx.producer);
>> if (!vq->call_ctx.ctx || irq < 0)
>> --
>> 2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists