[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220126152806.GN8034@ziepe.ca>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 11:28:06 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, kgraul@...ux.ibm.com,
kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/6] net/smc: Spread workload over multiple
cores
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 03:23:22PM +0800, Tony Lu wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 11:00:33AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >
> > Please CC RDMA mailing list next time.
> >
> > Why didn't you use already existed APIs in drivers/infiniband/core/cq.c?
> > ib_cq_pool_get() will do most if not all of your open-coded CQ spreading
> > logic.
>
> I am working on replacing with ib_cq_pool_get(), this need ib_poll_context
> to indicate the poller which provides by ib_poll_handler(). It's okay
> for now, but for the callback function. When it polled a ib_wc, it
> would call wc->wr_cqe->done(cq, wc), which is the union with wr_id. The
> wr_id is heavily used in SMC.
Part of using the new interface is converting to use wr_cqe, you
should just do that work instead of trying to duplicate a core API in
a driver.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists