netdev - Re: [net-next v5 1/2] net: sched: use queue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAM_iQpWcqPEhX6QMDycJWSkvKhhSs7OGmgqEi+yUj0BMDAWk3w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Jan 2022 11:58:52 -0800
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
Cc:     Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...me>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Talal Ahmad <talalahmad@...gle.com>,
        Kevin Hao <haokexin@...il.com>,
        Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>,
        Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>,
        Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [net-next v5 1/2] net: sched: use queue_mapping to pick tx queue

On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 9:03 PM Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com> wrote:
> Yes, I think this is key. In k8s, we can not control the priority of
> applications in Pod. and I think 2/2 patch

Why not? Please be more specific.

> can provide more mechanisms to select queues from a range.

Well, you just keep ignoring eBPF action which provides
literally infinitely more choices than yours. So, you want more
choices but still refuse using eBPF action, what point are you
trying to make?

Thanks.