[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fbc8acbe-4c12-9c68-0418-51e97457d30b@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 21:28:46 +0000
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next v4] cgroup/bpf: fast path skb BPF filtering
On 1/26/22 20:30, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 12:22:13AM +0000, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> #define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET_INGRESS(sk, skb) \
>> ({ \
>> int __ret = 0; \
>> - if (cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_INET_INGRESS)) \
>> + if (cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_INET_INGRESS) && sk && \
> From reading sk_filter_trim_cap() where this will be called, sk cannot be NULL.
> If yes, the new sk test is not needed.
Well, there is no sane way to verify how it's used considering
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cgroup_bpf_run_filter_skb);
but can remove the check if nobody cares
> Others lgtm.
>
>> + cgroup_bpf_sock_enabled(sk, CGROUP_INET_INGRESS)) \
>> __ret = __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_skb(sk, skb, \
>> CGROUP_INET_INGRESS); \
>> \
--
Pavel Begunkov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists