[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220127083240.1425481-1-houtao1@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 16:32:40 +0800
From: Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
CC: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
<houtao1@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, x86: remove unnecessary handling of BPF_SUB atomic op
According to the LLVM commit (https://reviews.llvm.org/D72184),
sync_fetch_and_sub() is implemented as a negation followed by
sync_fetch_and_add(), so there will be no BPF_SUB op and just
remove it.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>
---
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index ce1f86f245c9..5d643ebb1e56 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -787,7 +787,6 @@ static int emit_atomic(u8 **pprog, u8 atomic_op,
/* emit opcode */
switch (atomic_op) {
case BPF_ADD:
- case BPF_SUB:
case BPF_AND:
case BPF_OR:
case BPF_XOR:
--
2.29.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists