[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220127002605.4049593-1-maheshb@google.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 16:26:05 -0800
From: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
To: Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Mahesh Bandewar <mahesh@...dewar.net>,
Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH next] bonding: pair enable_port with slave_arr_updates
When 803.2ad mode enables a participating port, it should update
the slave-array. I have observed that the member links are participating
and are part of the active aggregator while the traffic is egressing via
only one member link (in a case where two links are participating). Via
krpobes I discovered that that slave-arr has only one link added while
the other participating link wasn't part of the slave-arr.
I couldn't see what caused that situation but the simple code-walk
through provided me hints that the enable_port wasn't always associated
with the slave-array update.
Signed-off-by: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
index 6006c2e8fa2b..f20bbc18a03f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
@@ -1024,6 +1024,8 @@ static void ad_mux_machine(struct port *port, bool *update_slave_arr)
__enable_port(port);
}
+ /* Slave array needs update */
+ *update_slave_arr = true;
}
break;
default:
@@ -1779,6 +1781,8 @@ static void ad_agg_selection_logic(struct aggregator *agg,
port = port->next_port_in_aggregator) {
__enable_port(port);
}
+ /* Slave array needs update. */
+ *update_slave_arr = true;
}
}
--
2.35.0.rc0.227.g00780c9af4-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists