netdev - [PATCH net 5/8] netfilter: nft_reject_bridge: Fix for missing reply from prerouting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220127235235.656931-6-pablo@netfilter.org>
Date:   Fri, 28 Jan 2022 00:52:32 +0100
From:   Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:     netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH net 5/8] netfilter: nft_reject_bridge: Fix for missing reply from prerouting

From: Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>

Prior to commit fa538f7cf05aa ("netfilter: nf_reject: add reject skbuff
creation helpers"), nft_reject_bridge did not assign to nskb->dev before
passing nskb on to br_forward(). The shared skbuff creation helpers
introduced in above commit do which seems to confuse br_forward() as
reject statements in prerouting hook won't emit a packet anymore.

Fix this by simply passing NULL instead of 'dev' to the helpers - they
use the pointer for just that assignment, nothing else.

Fixes: fa538f7cf05aa ("netfilter: nf_reject: add reject skbuff creation helpers")
Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
---
 net/bridge/netfilter/nft_reject_bridge.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bridge/netfilter/nft_reject_bridge.c b/net/bridge/netfilter/nft_reject_bridge.c
index eba0efe64d05..fbf858ddec35 100644
--- a/net/bridge/netfilter/nft_reject_bridge.c
+++ b/net/bridge/netfilter/nft_reject_bridge.c
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static void nft_reject_br_send_v4_tcp_reset(struct net *net,
 {
 	struct sk_buff *nskb;
 
-	nskb = nf_reject_skb_v4_tcp_reset(net, oldskb, dev, hook);
+	nskb = nf_reject_skb_v4_tcp_reset(net, oldskb, NULL, hook);
 	if (!nskb)
 		return;
 
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static void nft_reject_br_send_v4_unreach(struct net *net,
 {
 	struct sk_buff *nskb;
 
-	nskb = nf_reject_skb_v4_unreach(net, oldskb, dev, hook, code);
+	nskb = nf_reject_skb_v4_unreach(net, oldskb, NULL, hook, code);
 	if (!nskb)
 		return;
 
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static void nft_reject_br_send_v6_tcp_reset(struct net *net,
 {
 	struct sk_buff *nskb;
 
-	nskb = nf_reject_skb_v6_tcp_reset(net, oldskb, dev, hook);
+	nskb = nf_reject_skb_v6_tcp_reset(net, oldskb, NULL, hook);
 	if (!nskb)
 		return;
 
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ static void nft_reject_br_send_v6_unreach(struct net *net,
 {
 	struct sk_buff *nskb;
 
-	nskb = nf_reject_skb_v6_unreach(net, oldskb, dev, hook, code);
+	nskb = nf_reject_skb_v6_unreach(net, oldskb, NULL, hook, code);
 	if (!nskb)
 		return;
 
-- 
2.30.2