lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220127185105.5e039b11@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Thu, 27 Jan 2022 18:51:05 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Sun Shouxin <sunshouxin@...natelecom.cn>
Cc:     j.vosburgh@...il.com, vfalico@...il.com, andy@...yhouse.net,
        davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jay.vosburgh@...onical.com,
        nikolay@...dia.com, huyd12@...natelecom.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10] net: bonding: Add support for IPV6 ns/na to
 balance-alb/balance-tlb mode

On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 21:39:16 -0500 Sun Shouxin wrote:
> Since ipv6 neighbor solicitation and advertisement messages
> isn't handled gracefully in bond6 driver, we can see packet
> drop due to inconsistency between mac address in the option
> message and source MAC .
> 
> Another examples is ipv6 neighbor solicitation and advertisement
> messages from VM via tap attached to host bridge, the src mac
> might be changed through balance-alb mode, but it is not synced
> with Link-layer address in the option message.
> 
> The patch implements bond6's tx handle for ipv6 neighbor
> solicitation and advertisement messages.
> 
> Suggested-by: Hu Yadi <huyd12@...natelecom.cn>
> Acked-by: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sun Shouxin <sunshouxin@...natelecom.cn>

Did you just resend v10? I commented on this patch a few minutes ago...
and it was also a v10. You can see the status of your patch in
patchwork: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/
There is no need to repost if the patch is in "active" state like "New"
or "Under Review".

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ