[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzYHggCfbSGb8autEDcHhZXabK-n36rggyjJeL0uLEr+DQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 16:02:00 -0800
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: use getpagesize() to initialize
ring buffer size
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 6:34 PM Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> 4096 is OK for x86-64, but for other archs with greater than 4KB
> page size (e.g. 64KB under arm64), test_verifier for test case
> "check valid spill/fill, ptr to mem" will fail, so just use
> getpagesize() to initialize the ring buffer size. Do this for
> test_progs as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/d_path.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_ima.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/ima.c | 1 -
> .../bpf/progs/test_d_path_check_types.c | 1 -
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
[...]
> @@ -86,5 +94,6 @@ void test_test_ima(void)
> CHECK(err, "failed to run command", "%s, errno = %d\n", cmd, errno);
> close_prog:
> ring_buffer__free(ringbuf);
> +destroy_skel:
> ima__destroy(skel);
> }
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/ima.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/ima.c
> index 96060ff4ffc6..e192a9f16aea 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/ima.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/ima.c
> @@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ u32 monitored_pid = 0;
>
> struct {
> __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_RINGBUF);
> - __uint(max_entries, 1 << 12);
Should we just bump it to 64/128/256KB instead? It's quite annoying to
do a split open and then load just due to this...
I'm also wondering if we should either teach kernel to round up to
closes power-of-2 of page_size internally, or teach libbpf to do this
for RINGBUF maps. Thoughts?
> } ringbuf SEC(".maps");
>
> char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_d_path_check_types.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_d_path_check_types.c
> index 7e02b7361307..1b68d4a65abb 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_d_path_check_types.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_d_path_check_types.c
> @@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ extern const int bpf_prog_active __ksym;
>
> struct {
> __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_RINGBUF);
> - __uint(max_entries, 1 << 12);
> } ringbuf SEC(".maps");
>
> SEC("fentry/security_inode_getattr")
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
> index 29bbaa58233c..6acb5e747715 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
> @@ -931,7 +931,7 @@ static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, enum bpf_prog_type prog_type,
> }
> if (*fixup_map_ringbuf) {
> map_fds[20] = create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_RINGBUF, 0,
> - 0, 4096);
> + 0, getpagesize());
> do {
> prog[*fixup_map_ringbuf].imm = map_fds[20];
> fixup_map_ringbuf++;
> --
> 2.29.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists