netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/9] libbpf: Implement changes needed for BTFGen in bpftool

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1b081b16-d91e-01fd-9154-7845782e8715@isovalent.com>
Date:   Tue, 1 Feb 2022 20:57:38 +0000
From:   Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>
To:     Mauricio Vásquez <mauricio@...volk.io>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Rafael David Tinoco <rafaeldtinoco@...il.com>,
        Lorenzo Fontana <lorenzo.fontana@...stic.co>,
        Leonardo Di Donato <leonardo.didonato@...stic.co>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/9] libbpf: Implement changes needed for
 BTFGen in bpftool

2022-01-28 17:33 UTC-0500 ~ Mauricio Vásquez <mauricio@...volk.io>
> This commit extends libbpf with the features that are needed to
> implement BTFGen:
> 
> - Implement bpf_core_create_cand_cache() and bpf_core_free_cand_cache()
> to handle candidates cache.
> - Expose bpf_core_add_cands() and bpf_core_free_cands to handle
> candidates list.
> - Expose bpf_core_calc_relo_insn() to bpftool.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vásquez <mauricio@...volk.io>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco@...asec.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Fontana <lorenzo.fontana@...stic.co>
> Signed-off-by: Leonardo Di Donato <leonardo.didonato@...stic.co>

Hi, note that the patchset (or at least, this patch) does not apply
cleanly. Can you please double-check that it is based on bpf-next?

> ---
>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c          | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h | 12 +++++++++
>  2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> index 12771f71a6e7..61384d219e28 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> @@ -5195,18 +5195,18 @@ size_t bpf_core_essential_name_len(const char *name)
>  	return n;
>  }
>  
> -static void bpf_core_free_cands(struct bpf_core_cand_list *cands)
> +void bpf_core_free_cands(struct bpf_core_cand_list *cands)
>  {
>  	free(cands->cands);
>  	free(cands);
>  }
>  
> -static int bpf_core_add_cands(struct bpf_core_cand *local_cand,
> -			      size_t local_essent_len,
> -			      const struct btf *targ_btf,
> -			      const char *targ_btf_name,
> -			      int targ_start_id,
> -			      struct bpf_core_cand_list *cands)
> +int bpf_core_add_cands(struct bpf_core_cand *local_cand,
> +		       size_t local_essent_len,
> +		       const struct btf *targ_btf,
> +		       const char *targ_btf_name,
> +		       int targ_start_id,
> +		       struct bpf_core_cand_list *cands)
>  {
>  	struct bpf_core_cand *new_cands, *cand;
>  	const struct btf_type *t, *local_t;
> @@ -5577,6 +5577,25 @@ static int bpf_core_resolve_relo(struct bpf_program *prog,
>  				       targ_res);
>  }
>  
> +struct hashmap *bpf_core_create_cand_cache(void)
> +{
> +	return hashmap__new(bpf_core_hash_fn, bpf_core_equal_fn, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +void bpf_core_free_cand_cache(struct hashmap *cand_cache)
> +{
> +	struct hashmap_entry *entry;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(cand_cache))
> +		return;
> +
> +	hashmap__for_each_entry(cand_cache, entry, i) {
> +		bpf_core_free_cands(entry->value);
> +	}
> +	hashmap__free(cand_cache);
> +}
> +
>  static int
>  bpf_object__relocate_core(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *targ_btf_path)
>  {
> @@ -5584,7 +5603,6 @@ bpf_object__relocate_core(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *targ_btf_path)
>  	struct bpf_core_relo_res targ_res;
>  	const struct bpf_core_relo *rec;
>  	const struct btf_ext_info *seg;
> -	struct hashmap_entry *entry;
>  	struct hashmap *cand_cache = NULL;
>  	struct bpf_program *prog;
>  	struct bpf_insn *insn;
> @@ -5603,7 +5621,7 @@ bpf_object__relocate_core(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *targ_btf_path)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	cand_cache = hashmap__new(bpf_core_hash_fn, bpf_core_equal_fn, NULL);
> +	cand_cache = bpf_core_create_cand_cache();
>  	if (IS_ERR(cand_cache)) {
>  		err = PTR_ERR(cand_cache);
>  		goto out;
> @@ -5694,12 +5712,8 @@ bpf_object__relocate_core(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *targ_btf_path)
>  	btf__free(obj->btf_vmlinux_override);
>  	obj->btf_vmlinux_override = NULL;
>  
> -	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(cand_cache)) {
> -		hashmap__for_each_entry(cand_cache, entry, i) {
> -			bpf_core_free_cands(entry->value);
> -		}
> -		hashmap__free(cand_cache);
> -	}
> +	bpf_core_free_cand_cache(cand_cache);
> +
>  	return err;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
> index bc86b82e90d1..686a5654262b 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
> @@ -529,4 +529,16 @@ static inline int ensure_good_fd(int fd)
>  	return fd;
>  }
>  
> +struct hashmap;
> +
> +struct hashmap *bpf_core_create_cand_cache(void);
> +void bpf_core_free_cand_cache(struct hashmap *cand_cache);
> +int bpf_core_add_cands(struct bpf_core_cand *local_cand,
> +		       size_t local_essent_len,
> +		       const struct btf *targ_btf,
> +		       const char *targ_btf_name,
> +		       int targ_start_id,
> +		       struct bpf_core_cand_list *cands);
> +void bpf_core_free_cands(struct bpf_core_cand_list *cands);

I wonder if these might deserve a comment to mention that they are
exposed for bpftool? I fear someone might attempt to clean it up and
remove the unused exports otherwise.