[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 08:26:54 +0100
From: Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>
To: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>
Cc: Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>, kuba@...nel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Partially revert "net/smc: Add netlink net namespace
support"
On 02/02/2022 04:09, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> The change of sizeof(struct smc_diag_linkinfo) by commit 79d39fc503b4
> ("net/smc: Add netlink net namespace support") introduced an ABI
> regression: since struct smc_diag_lgrinfo contains an object of
> type "struct smc_diag_linkinfo", offset of all subsequent members
> of struct smc_diag_lgrinfo was changed by that change.
>
> As result, applications compiled with the old version
> of struct smc_diag_linkinfo will receive garbage in
> struct smc_diag_lgrinfo.role if the kernel implements
> this new version of struct smc_diag_linkinfo.
>
> Fix this regression by reverting the part of commit 79d39fc503b4 that
> changes struct smc_diag_linkinfo. After all, there is SMC_GEN_NETLINK
> interface which is good enough, so there is probably no need to touch
> the smc_diag ABI in the first place.
Reviewed-by: Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>
Thank you Dmitry.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists