netdev - Re: [PATCH net 2/2] net: ipa: request IPA register values be retained

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 3 Feb 2022 08:03:09 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, agross@...nel.org, mka@...omium.org,
        evgreen@...omium.org, cpratapa@...eaurora.org,
        avuyyuru@...eaurora.org, jponduru@...eaurora.org,
        subashab@...eaurora.org, elder@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] net: ipa: request IPA register values be
 retained

On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 05:22:23 -0600 Alex Elder wrote:
> On 2/2/22 11:02 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue,  1 Feb 2022 08:04:12 -0600 Alex Elder wrote:  
> >> Fixes: 2775cbc5afeb6 ("net: ipa: rename "ipa_clock.c"")  
> > 
> > The Fixes tag should point at the place the code was introduced,
> > even if it moved or otherwise the patch won't apply as far back.  
> 
> The problem was not "activated" until this commit:
>    1aac309d32075 net: ipa: use autosuspend
> 
> 
> And that commit was merged together in a series that
> included the one I mentioned above:
>    2775cbc5afeb6 net: ipa: rename "ipa_clock.c"
> 
> The rename commit is two commits after "use autosuspend".
> 
> The merge commit was:
>    863434886497d Merge branch 'ipa-autosuspend'
> 
> 
> Until autosuspend is enabled, this new code is
> completely unnecessary, so back-porting it beyond
> that is pointless.  I supplied the commit in the
> "Fixes" tag because I thought it would be close
> to equivalent and would avoid some trouble back-porting.
> 
> Perhaps the "use autosuspend" commit is the one that
> should be in the "Fixes" tag, but I don't believe it
> should be back-ported any further than that.
> 
> Re-spinning the series to fix the tag is trivial, but
> before I do that, can you tell me which commit you
> recommend I use in the "Fixes" tag?
> 
> The original commit that introduced the microcontroller
> code (and also included the clock/power code) is:
>    a646d6ec90983 soc: qcom: ipa: modem and microcontroller

Thanks for the explanation 1aac309d32075 sounds like the right choice.
Let me just swap it for you and apply the v2.