| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAHap4zsrgyBzBdQj2O9xLo5fsi1op9png_3nQRJp=i18Pdn+9A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 11:08:55 -0500
From: Mauricio Vásquez Bernal <mauricio@...volk.io>
To: Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>
Cc: Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Rafael David Tinoco <rafaeldtinoco@...il.com>,
Lorenzo Fontana <lorenzo.fontana@...stic.co>,
Leonardo Di Donato <leonardo.didonato@...stic.co>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/9] libbpf: Implement changes needed for
BTFGen in bpftool
On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 3:57 PM Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com> wrote:
>
> 2022-01-28 17:33 UTC-0500 ~ Mauricio Vásquez <mauricio@...volk.io>
> > This commit extends libbpf with the features that are needed to
> > implement BTFGen:
> >
> > - Implement bpf_core_create_cand_cache() and bpf_core_free_cand_cache()
> > to handle candidates cache.
> > - Expose bpf_core_add_cands() and bpf_core_free_cands to handle
> > candidates list.
> > - Expose bpf_core_calc_relo_insn() to bpftool.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vásquez <mauricio@...volk.io>
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco@...asec.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Fontana <lorenzo.fontana@...stic.co>
> > Signed-off-by: Leonardo Di Donato <leonardo.didonato@...stic.co>
>
> Hi, note that the patchset (or at least, this patch) does not apply
> cleanly. Can you please double-check that it is based on bpf-next?
I missed one commit on this submission...
> > ---
> > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h | 12 +++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > index 12771f71a6e7..61384d219e28 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > @@ -5195,18 +5195,18 @@ size_t bpf_core_essential_name_len(const char *name)
> > return n;
> > }
> >
> > -static void bpf_core_free_cands(struct bpf_core_cand_list *cands)
> > +void bpf_core_free_cands(struct bpf_core_cand_list *cands)
> > {
> > free(cands->cands);
> > free(cands);
> > }
> >
> > -static int bpf_core_add_cands(struct bpf_core_cand *local_cand,
> > - size_t local_essent_len,
> > - const struct btf *targ_btf,
> > - const char *targ_btf_name,
> > - int targ_start_id,
> > - struct bpf_core_cand_list *cands)
> > +int bpf_core_add_cands(struct bpf_core_cand *local_cand,
> > + size_t local_essent_len,
> > + const struct btf *targ_btf,
> > + const char *targ_btf_name,
> > + int targ_start_id,
> > + struct bpf_core_cand_list *cands)
> > {
> > struct bpf_core_cand *new_cands, *cand;
> > const struct btf_type *t, *local_t;
> > @@ -5577,6 +5577,25 @@ static int bpf_core_resolve_relo(struct bpf_program *prog,
> > targ_res);
> > }
> >
> > +struct hashmap *bpf_core_create_cand_cache(void)
> > +{
> > + return hashmap__new(bpf_core_hash_fn, bpf_core_equal_fn, NULL);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void bpf_core_free_cand_cache(struct hashmap *cand_cache)
> > +{
> > + struct hashmap_entry *entry;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(cand_cache))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + hashmap__for_each_entry(cand_cache, entry, i) {
> > + bpf_core_free_cands(entry->value);
> > + }
> > + hashmap__free(cand_cache);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int
> > bpf_object__relocate_core(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *targ_btf_path)
> > {
> > @@ -5584,7 +5603,6 @@ bpf_object__relocate_core(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *targ_btf_path)
> > struct bpf_core_relo_res targ_res;
> > const struct bpf_core_relo *rec;
> > const struct btf_ext_info *seg;
> > - struct hashmap_entry *entry;
> > struct hashmap *cand_cache = NULL;
> > struct bpf_program *prog;
> > struct bpf_insn *insn;
> > @@ -5603,7 +5621,7 @@ bpf_object__relocate_core(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *targ_btf_path)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > - cand_cache = hashmap__new(bpf_core_hash_fn, bpf_core_equal_fn, NULL);
> > + cand_cache = bpf_core_create_cand_cache();
> > if (IS_ERR(cand_cache)) {
> > err = PTR_ERR(cand_cache);
> > goto out;
> > @@ -5694,12 +5712,8 @@ bpf_object__relocate_core(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *targ_btf_path)
> > btf__free(obj->btf_vmlinux_override);
> > obj->btf_vmlinux_override = NULL;
> >
> > - if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(cand_cache)) {
> > - hashmap__for_each_entry(cand_cache, entry, i) {
> > - bpf_core_free_cands(entry->value);
> > - }
> > - hashmap__free(cand_cache);
> > - }
> > + bpf_core_free_cand_cache(cand_cache);
> > +
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
> > index bc86b82e90d1..686a5654262b 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
> > @@ -529,4 +529,16 @@ static inline int ensure_good_fd(int fd)
> > return fd;
> > }
> >
> > +struct hashmap;
> > +
> > +struct hashmap *bpf_core_create_cand_cache(void);
> > +void bpf_core_free_cand_cache(struct hashmap *cand_cache);
> > +int bpf_core_add_cands(struct bpf_core_cand *local_cand,
> > + size_t local_essent_len,
> > + const struct btf *targ_btf,
> > + const char *targ_btf_name,
> > + int targ_start_id,
> > + struct bpf_core_cand_list *cands);
> > +void bpf_core_free_cands(struct bpf_core_cand_list *cands);
>
> I wonder if these might deserve a comment to mention that they are
> exposed for bpftool? I fear someone might attempt to clean it up and
> remove the unused exports otherwise.
I added a comment there.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists