netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/9] bpftool: Implement btf_save

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 3 Feb 2022 09:23:05 -0800
From:   Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To:     Mauricio Vásquez Bernal <mauricio@...volk.io>
Cc:     Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>,
        Rafael David Tinoco <rafaeldtinoco@...il.com>,
        Lorenzo Fontana <lorenzo.fontana@...stic.co>,
        Leonardo Di Donato <leonardo.didonato@...stic.co>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/9] bpftool: Implement btf_save_raw()

On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 8:07 AM Mauricio Vásquez Bernal
<mauricio@...volk.io> wrote:
>
> > The logic looks good, but you need to merge adding this static
> > function with the patch that's using that static function. Otherwise
> > you will break bisectability because compiler will warn about unused
> > static function.
> >
>
> It only emits a warning but it compiles fine. Is that still an issue?

Yes, it breaks selftests build (warnings are treated as errors for
bpftool, it seems).