[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220203113924.3bf8e0b5@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 11:39:24 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] net: dev: Make rps_lock() disable
interrupts.
On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 17:41:30 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > I think you can re-jig this a little more - rps_ipi_queued() only return
> > 0 if sd is "local" so maybe we can call __napi_schedule_irqoff()
> > instead which already has the if () for PREEMPT_RT?
> >
> > Maybe moving the ____napi_schedule() into rps_ipi_queued() and
> > renaming it to napi_schedule_backlog() or napi_schedule_rps()
> > would make the code easier to follow in that case?
>
> Something like this then?
Exactly!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists