[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220202210638.07b83d41@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 21:06:38 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
Cc: bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, agross@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, mka@...omium.org, evgreen@...omium.org,
cpratapa@...eaurora.org, avuyyuru@...eaurora.org,
jponduru@...eaurora.org, subashab@...eaurora.org, elder@...nel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: add IPA qcom,qmp property
On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 08:07:23 -0600 Alex Elder wrote:
> At least three platforms require the "qcom,qmp" property to be
> specified, so the IPA driver can request register retention across
> power collapse. Update DTS files accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
> ---
>
> Dave, Jakub, please let Bjorn take this through the Qualcomm tree.
I don't know much about DT but the patch defining the property is
targeting net - will it not cause validation errors? Or Bjorn knows
to wait for the fixes to propagate? Or it doesn't matter? :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists