[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <164398920815.15398.4235704313850562330.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2022 15:40:08 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Hou Tao <hotforest@...il.com>
Cc: daniel@...earbox.net, ast@...nel.org, kafai@...com, yhs@...com,
andrii@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
john.fastabend@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, houtao1@...wei.com, zlim.lnx@...il.com,
catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, ard.biesheuvel@....com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/3] bpf, arm64: enable kfunc call
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>:
On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 17:29:14 +0800 you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The simple patchset tries to enable kfunc call for arm64. Patch #1 just
> overrides bpf_jit_supports_kfunc_call() to enable kfunc call, patch #2
> unexports the subtests in ksyms_module.c to fix the confusion in test
> output and patch #3 add a test in ksyms_module.c to ensure s32 is
> sufficient for kfunc offset.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,v3,1/3] bpf, arm64: enable kfunc call
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/b5e975d256db
- [bpf-next,v3,2/3] selftests/bpf: do not export subtest as standalone test
(no matching commit)
- [bpf-next,v3,3/3] selftests/bpf: check whether s32 is sufficient for kfunc offset
(no matching commit)
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists