lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yf1qc7R5rFoALsCo@linutronix.de>
Date:   Fri, 4 Feb 2022 19:03:31 +0100
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Yannick Vignon <yannick.vignon@....nxp.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
        Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>,
        Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>,
        Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        Xiaoliang Yang <xiaoliang.yang_1@....com>, mingkai.hu@....com,
        Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>,
        sebastien.laveze@....com, Yannick Vignon <yannick.vignon@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: napi: wake up ksoftirqd if needed
 after scheduling NAPI

On 2022-02-04 09:45:22 [-0800], Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Coincidentally, I believe the threaded NAPI wake up is buggy - 
> we assume the thread is only woken up when NAPI gets scheduled,
> but IIUC signal delivery and other rare paths may wake up kthreads,
> randomly.

I had to look into NAPI-threads for some reason.
What I dislike is that after enabling it via sysfs I have to:
- adjust task priority manual so it is preferred over other threads.
  This is usually important on RT. But then there is no overload
  protection.

- set an affinity-mask for the thread so it does not migrate from one
  CPU to the other. This is worse for a RT task where the scheduler
  tries to keep the task running.

Wouldn't it work to utilize the threaded-IRQ API and use that instead
the custom thread? Basically the primary handler would what it already
does (disable the interrupt) and the threaded handler would feed packets
into the stack. In the overload case one would need to lower the
thread-priority.

Sebastian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ