netdev - Re: [PATCH v8 bpf-next 4/9] bpf: use prog->jited_len in bpf_prog_ksym_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 4 Feb 2022 18:05:42 +0000
From:   Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
To:     Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
CC:     bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        "Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        "Kernel Team" <Kernel-team@...com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 bpf-next 4/9] bpf: use prog->jited_len in
 bpf_prog_ksym_set_addr()



> On Feb 3, 2022, at 11:41 PM, Song Liu <song@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 10:31 PM Song Liu <song@...nel.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Using prog->jited_len is simpler and more accurate than current
>> estimation (header + header->size).
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
> 
> Hmm... CI [1] reports error on test_progs 159/tailcalls, and bisect points to
> this one. However, I couldn't figure out why this breaks tail call.
> round_up(PAGE_SIZE) does fix it though. But that won't be accurate, right?
> 
> Any suggestions on what could be the reason for these failures?
> 
> Thanks,
> Song
> 
> [1] https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/runs/5060194776?check_suite_focus=true

I guess this is the missing piece:


diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 1ae41d0cf96c..bbef86cb4e72 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -13067,6 +13067,7 @@ static int jit_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)

        prog->jited = 1;
        prog->bpf_func = func[0]->bpf_func;
+       prog->jited_len = func[0]->jited_len;
        prog->aux->func = func;
        prog->aux->func_cnt = env->subprog_cnt;
        bpf_prog_jit_attempt_done(prog);


Will send v9 with this. 

> 
>> ---
>> kernel/bpf/core.c | 5 +----
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
>> index 14199228a6f0..e3fe53df0a71 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
>> @@ -537,13 +537,10 @@ long bpf_jit_limit_max __read_mostly;
>> static void
>> bpf_prog_ksym_set_addr(struct bpf_prog *prog)
>> {
>> -       const struct bpf_binary_header *hdr = bpf_jit_binary_hdr(prog);
>> -       unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)hdr;
>> -
>>        WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_prog_ebpf_jited(prog));
>> 
>>        prog->aux->ksym.start = (unsigned long) prog->bpf_func;
>> -       prog->aux->ksym.end   = addr + hdr->size;
>> +       prog->aux->ksym.end   = prog->aux->ksym.start + prog->jited_len;
>> }
>> 
>> static void
>> --
>> 2.30.2
>>