lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2022 14:13:53 +0900 From: Juhee Kang <claudiajkang@...il.com> To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> Cc: davem@...emloft.net, Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: hsr: use hlist_head instead of list_head for mac addresses On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 12:34 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 10:59:02 +0000 Juhee Kang wrote: > > Currently, HSR manages mac addresses of known HSR nodes by using list_head. > > It takes a lot of time when there are a lot of registered nodes due to > > finding specific mac address nodes by using linear search. We can be > > reducing the time by using hlist. Thus, this patch moves list_head to > > hlist_head for mac addresses and this allows for further improvement of > > network performance. > > > > Condition: registered 10,000 known HSR nodes > > Before: > > # iperf3 -c 192.168.10.1 -i 1 -t 10 > > Connecting to host 192.168.10.1, port 5201 > > [ 5] local 192.168.10.2 port 59442 connected to 192.168.10.1 port 5201 > > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd > > [ 5] 0.00-1.49 sec 3.75 MBytes 21.1 Mbits/sec 0 158 KBytes > > [ 5] 1.49-2.05 sec 1.25 MBytes 18.7 Mbits/sec 0 166 KBytes > > [ 5] 2.05-3.06 sec 2.44 MBytes 20.3 Mbits/sec 56 16.9 KBytes > > [ 5] 3.06-4.08 sec 1.43 MBytes 11.7 Mbits/sec 11 38.0 KBytes > > [ 5] 4.08-5.00 sec 951 KBytes 8.49 Mbits/sec 0 56.3 KBytes > > > > After: > > # iperf3 -c 192.168.10.1 -i 1 -t 10 > > Connecting to host 192.168.10.1, port 5201 > > [ 5] local 192.168.10.2 port 36460 connected to 192.168.10.1 port 5201 > > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd > > [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 7.39 MBytes 62.0 Mbits/sec 3 130 KBytes > > [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 5.06 MBytes 42.4 Mbits/sec 16 113 KBytes > > [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 8.58 MBytes 72.0 Mbits/sec 42 94.3 KBytes > > [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 7.44 MBytes 62.4 Mbits/sec 2 131 KBytes > > [ 5] 4.00-5.07 sec 8.13 MBytes 63.5 Mbits/sec 38 92.9 KBytes > > > > Signed-off-by: Juhee Kang <claudiajkang@...il.com> > > Does not apply to the current net-next tree, please rebase. Hi Jakub, Thank you for your review! So, I will send a v3 patch after some tests. Thank you so much!! -- Best regards, Juhee Kang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists