[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACGkMEuJ_v5g2ypLZ3eNhAcUM9Q3PpWuiaeWVfEC6KACGzWAZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2022 16:06:15 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/17] virtio_pci: struct virtio_pci_common_cfg add queue_notify_data
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 2:07 PM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 7 Feb 2022 11:41:06 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > 在 2022/1/26 下午3:35, Xuan Zhuo 写道:
> > > Add queue_notify_data in struct virtio_pci_common_cfg, which comes from
> > > here https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/issues/89
> > >
> > > Since I want to add queue_reset after it, I submitted this patch first.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
> > > ---
> > > include/uapi/linux/virtio_pci.h | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_pci.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_pci.h
> > > index 3a86f36d7e3d..492c89f56c6a 100644
> > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_pci.h
> > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_pci.h
> > > @@ -164,6 +164,7 @@ struct virtio_pci_common_cfg {
> > > __le32 queue_avail_hi; /* read-write */
> > > __le32 queue_used_lo; /* read-write */
> > > __le32 queue_used_hi; /* read-write */
> > > + __le16 queue_notify_data; /* read-write */
> > > };
> >
> >
> > So I had the same concern as previous version.
> >
> > This breaks uABI where program may try to use sizeof(struct
> > virtio_pci_common_cfg).
> >
> > We probably need a container structure here.
>
> I see, I plan to add a struct like this, do you think it's appropriate?
>
> struct virtio_pci_common_cfg_v1 {
> struct virtio_pci_common_cfg cfg;
> __le16 queue_notify_data; /* read-write */
> }
Something like this but we probably need a better name.
Thanks
>
> Thanks.
>
> >
> > THanks
> >
> >
> > >
> > > /* Fields in VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_PCI_CFG: */
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists