[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YgDoPwMk4o56bHaw@TonyMac-Alibaba>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2022 17:37:03 +0800
From: Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: kgraul@...ux.ibm.com, kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, matthieu.baerts@...sares.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 3/3] net/smc: Fallback when handshake
workqueue congested
On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 03:13:22PM +0800, D. Wythe wrote:
>
> After some trial and thought, I found that the scope of netlink control is
> too large, we should limit the scope to socket. Adding a socket option may
> be a better choice, what do you think?
>
It is a good idea to be a socket-level config. Maybe we could consider
netlink as default global behaviour.
Thanks,
Tony Lu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists