lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2022 17:37:03 +0800 From: Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com> To: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com> Cc: kgraul@...ux.ibm.com, kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, matthieu.baerts@...sares.net Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 3/3] net/smc: Fallback when handshake workqueue congested On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 03:13:22PM +0800, D. Wythe wrote: > > After some trial and thought, I found that the scope of netlink control is > too large, we should limit the scope to socket. Adding a socket option may > be a better choice, what do you think? > It is a good idea to be a socket-level config. Maybe we could consider netlink as default global behaviour. Thanks, Tony Lu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists