netdev - [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/3] selftests/bpf: Fix strict mode calculation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220207145052.124421-4-mauricio@kinvolk.io>
Date:   Mon,  7 Feb 2022 09:50:52 -0500
From:   Mauricio Vásquez <mauricio@...volk.io>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/3] selftests/bpf: Fix strict mode calculation

"(__LIBBPF_STRICT_LAST - 1) & ~LIBBPF_STRICT_MAP_DEFINITIONS" is wrong
as it is equal to 0 (LIBBPF_STRICT_NONE). Let's use
"LIBBPF_STRICT_ALL & ~LIBBPF_STRICT_MAP_DEFINITIONS" now that the
previous commit makes it possible in libbpf.

Fixes: 93b8952d223a ("libbpf: deprecate legacy BPF map definitions")

Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vásquez <mauricio@...volk.io>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c
index 14f9b6136794..4b93789acd86 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c
@@ -4561,7 +4561,7 @@ static void do_test_file(unsigned int test_num)
 	btf_ext__free(btf_ext);
 
 	/* temporary disable LIBBPF_STRICT_MAP_DEFINITIONS to test legacy maps */
-	libbpf_set_strict_mode((__LIBBPF_STRICT_LAST - 1) & ~LIBBPF_STRICT_MAP_DEFINITIONS);
+	libbpf_set_strict_mode(LIBBPF_STRICT_ALL & ~LIBBPF_STRICT_MAP_DEFINITIONS);
 	obj = bpf_object__open(test->file);
 	err = libbpf_get_error(obj);
 	if (CHECK(err, "obj: %d", err))
-- 
2.25.1