netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add support for bridge port locked feature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YgJvm3fy5SBOpiPk@lunn.ch>
Date:   Tue, 8 Feb 2022 14:26:51 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Hans Schultz <schultz.hans@...il.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add support for bridge
 port locked feature

On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 01:14:45PM +0100, Hans Schultz wrote:
> On mån, feb 07, 2022 at 15:05, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 11:07:41AM +0100, Hans Schultz wrote:
> >> Supporting bridge port locked mode using the 802.1X mode in Marvell
> >> mv88e6xxx switchcores is described in the '88E6096/88E6097/88E6097F
> >> Datasheet', sections 4.4.6, 4.4.7 and 5.1.2.1 (Drop on Lock).
> >
> > This implementation seems to be incorrect for 6390X, and maybe
> > others. I just picked a modern devices at random, and it is different,
> > so didn't check any other devices.  The 6390X uses bits 14 and 15, not
> > just bit 14.
> >
> > So either you need to narrow down support to just those devices this
> > actually works for, or you need to add implementations for all
> > generations, via an op in mv88e6xxx_ops.
> >
> >     Andrew
> 
> The 6096 and 6097 also use both bits 15 and 14, with '01' being Drop On
> Lock and the default being '00' No SA filtering. '11' is drop to CPU, which
> can also be used for 801.1X, so 'x1' should suffice for these devices,
> thus setting bit 14 seems appropriate.

Your code does not make this clear. Please define all four values, and
then mask and set both bits as needed.

Thanks

    Andrew