[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <776f76fc-6a0e-44e4-f880-9cffe65dd4b0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2022 20:12:15 -0800
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 03/11] ipv6/addrconf: switch to per netns
inet6_addr_lst hash table
On 2/7/22 9:17 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
> IPv6 does not scale very well with the number of IPv6 addresses.
> It uses a global (shared by all netns) hash table with 256 buckets.
>
> Some functions like addrconf_verify_rtnl() and addrconf_ifdown()
> have to iterate all addresses in the hash table.
>
> I have seen addrconf_verify_rtnl() holding the cpu for 10ms or more.
>
> Switch to the per netns hashtable (and spinlock) added
> in prior patches.
>
> This considerably speeds up netns dismantle times on hosts
> with thousands of netns.
this has to speed up many aspects of ipv6 addresses, not just the teardown.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> ---
> net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 77 ++++++++++++++-------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists