[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220208062533.3802081-1-song@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2022 22:25:33 -0800
From: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
To: <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <ast@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>, <andrii@...nel.org>,
<kernel-team@...com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, x86_64: fail gracefully on bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize failures
Instead of BUG_ON(), fail gracefully and return orig_prog.
Fixes: 1022a5498f6f ("bpf, x86_64: Use bpf_jit_binary_pack_alloc")
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
---
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 643f38b91e30..08e8fd8f954a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -2380,7 +2380,11 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
*
* Both cases are serious bugs that we should not continue.
*/
- BUG_ON(bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize(prog, header, rw_header));
+ if (WARN_ON(bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize(prog, header, rw_header))) {
+ prog = orig_prog;
+ goto out_addrs;
+ }
+
bpf_tail_call_direct_fixup(prog);
} else {
jit_data->addrs = addrs;
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists